|
The New Rouse Hill
Interview
Two
Interviewee:
Stephen Driscoll, born 1967
Interviewer:
Frank Heimans,
for
Baulkham Hills Shire Council
Date of Interview:
22 June 2007
Transcription:
Glenys Murray, July 2007
So what is your present position with Landcom then?
I have a
number of roles at Landcom I operate loosely under the term of the Development
Director. So the development that I am helping direct is the Rouse Hill
project, The New Rouse Hill. But I also because of my background provide
general town planning advice to all Landcom staff on the projects that
they're working on. I ‘m also in charge of the Sustainability Policy Unit
at Landcom so we’re looking to always increase the sustainability elements
of our projects and so my team and myself provide again across Landcom
support to the various other project teams on sustainability issues that
they could be able to employ.
Now
you spent ten years with Blacktown Council before you had your present
position. What were the challenges in your job there?
Blacktown
Council was a really interesting place to work at. It was a very diverse
Council, it was really like two councils. There was a developing part
of Blacktown which was a more affluent part of Blacktown and then there
was a more established part of Blacktown which was still developing but
not as rapidly as the Eastern portion of Blacktown. The challenges there
were coping with growth. Since the 1940’s really post war Blacktown had
been a place where growth and development had occurred. Initially it was
along the railway lines, around the railway stations and along the major
arterial roads. Through the 50’s, 60’s, 70’s and 80’s land was released
in the Western part of the city mainly and then in the 1990’s that land
release programme moved to the Eastern portion of the city and to its
Northern part. Part of the North West Sector and again just the challenges
of keeping up with that growth at different times Blacktown was the fastest
growing LGA in NSW and one of the fastest in Australia. With average increases
of between 5,000 and 8,000 people each year that’s a fairly rapid rate
of growth. There are other council areas that have had higher absolute
numbers than that at different times but just coping with that number
of people coming in. The demands that they place on Local Government for
services allowing for sensible distribution of those people across the
city, making sure they’ve got the services they need. They were the biggest
challenges that Blacktown had. Doing all of that in a way that was financially
responsible.
There
was a site in Blacktown that was being considered for five thousand dwellings
wasn’t it in a former quarry. What can you tell me about that?
Yeah that
was one of the projects I worked on as a relatively young town planner.
That was in the Woodcroft area,
 |
|
Detail of activity surrounding The New Rouse Hill (Clockwise: Castlebrooke
Cemetary, Schofields Road, Ironbark Ridge PS, Beaumont Hills, Kellyville
Ridge) April 2006
|
an old quarry that had come to the end
of its life. State Brickworks was sold to a developer and the challenge
on that site was to rehabilitate that site to a standard that was suitable
for development for roughly about five thousand dwellings. That happened
during the early part of the 1990’s.
What’s
the current population now of the Rouse Hill area and what number do you
think it is predicted to rise by say 2020?
The area
surrounding The New Rouse Hill probably has a population around eighty
odd thousand people at present. Really like all things it depends on where
you draw your boundaries and what you consider to be part of that Rouse
Hill area. If we can consider the area that started to develop for urban
uses in the middle of the 1990’s as being the Rouse Hill area then there’s
a current population of about eighty odd thousand people and by 2020 it
won’t be fully developed in all likelihood but the regional population
is ultimately expected to be something around two hundred and fifty thousand
people and it would be getting pretty close to that. There would probably
be about two hundred thousand on current projections in that area.
So which suburbs are you including in that immediate area that you’re
talking about?
It’s a broad
sweep the majority of that area lies in the City of Blacktown and it’s
in general terms the area north of the M7 motorway and includes suburbs
such as Parklea, Stanhope Gardens, Kellyville, Kellyville Ridge, Riverstone,
Vineyard, Schofields and Marsden Park. So that’s a fairly broad sweep
of the City of Blacktown. A little bit out of the City of Hawkesbury the
suburb of Vineyard spills over into Hawkesbury, Vineyard and Mulgrave.
Then over in Baulkham Hills its suburbs such as again Kellyville that’s
a shared suburb between Blacktown and Baulkham Hills, Rouse Hill, Beaumont
Hills, North Kellyville, Box Hill and Annangrove.
Is
the North West (Norwest) Business Park part of that?
Yes North
West (Norwest) Business Park is in fact part of that and so that
includes places such as Bella Vista, Bella Vista Waters and as far south
as that freeway reservation where it cuts through West Baulkham Hills
area.
Quite
a large area?
Yes it is.
Now
what is your brief as far as The New Rouse Hill development is concerned?
Landcom,
who I work for at present, is representing the government’s interests
in the development of the New Rouse Hill. The site is owned by the government.
The Department of Planning owns the site and we’re effectively acting
as the Department of Planning’s Development Manager. So we’re providing
the development expertise to the Department of Planning and helping manage
with them the joint venture partners of Lend Lease and GPT (General Property
Trust) who are doing the development of The New Rouse Hill.
So
what stake does Landcom have in this whole development?
We have a
financial stake. We’ve contributed money to the Department of Planning
to allow us to share in some of the profits from the development.
 |
|
Aspects of the Mungerie Park Course still present on the corner
of Commercial and Windsor Roads (April 2006)
|
Our
stake though is really to make sure that the vision the government developed
for the site close to twenty odd years ago is the vision that is put on
the ground by the developers. To that extent it’s a good job because by
in large that is what is being put on the ground.
So
what was that vision that was developed twenty years ago by the government?
Can you tell me about that?
The North
West Sector was identified as an area for Sydney’s future urban expansion
as far back as “The Sydney Region Outline Plan” in 1968. A circle was
drawn over the northwest area and said this is a future area for Sydney’s
expansion. Nothing much then happened for about fifteen years and then
the early part of the 1980’s the Department of Planning went and purchased
land on which the Mungerie Park Golf Course sat on the corner of Commercial
Road and Windsor Road. The decision was taken at that time that, that
site would be the regional centre for the northwest sector. Shortly after
that the necessary planning studies to work out how land uses would be
allocated and so on in that area were commenced. It’s rolled on from there.
Now there was earlier development in Rouse Hill when they started building
the first houses?
So what happened
was there was a planning framework that was developed over the next ten
years from roughly the early part of the eighties to the early part of
the nineties. In 1991 the local governments of Blacktown and Baulkham
Hills each rezoned approximately fifteen hundred hectares of land in their
respective local government areas to open up the first areas for development
in The Rouse Hill Development Area. Over on the Baulkham Hills side that
land included what is now developing as The New Rouse Hill. It is only
just been these last few years that there has been a sufficient impetus
and it’s been economically viable to develop the land for the regional
centre. It needed for its residential catchment to develop to a certain
level before it would be financially viable to do what Lend Lease and
GPT are now doing.
There
were some houses built at Rouse Hill in the 1990’s which some people consider
was not an appropriate development. Tell me a bit about that?
Yes, the
Baulkham Hills part of the Rouse Hill Development Area is a more fragmented
area than the Blacktown portion and whereas on the Blacktown side the
Landcom holdings were the first developed and they were fairly contiguous
with the existing urban area. So the expansion of services and infrastructure
and transport and those sorts of things on the Blacktown side whilst challenging
was able to be done in a fairly orderly and sensible manner. Unfortunately
over on the Baulkham Hills side, three major land owners that were starting
off the initial development there. One was at the extreme southern end
of the area, one was at the extreme northern end of the area and one was
roughly in the middle. So there were three development fronts that opened
upon the Baulkham Hills side. That led to a lot of pressures for Baulkham
Hills Council and for the local and regional community in coping with
development on such a large front. So services such as schools and so
on. Whereas on the Blacktown side there was a consolidated development
front and so a school was able to be provided within the first five years
because a threshold population was met. Roughly the same rate of development
was occurring over on the Baulkham Hills side but it was spread one third,
one third, one third. So it took much longer for there to be a critical
mass sufficient to support those higher order services such as schools
or even shops over on the Baulkham Hills side. It meant that existing
services were stretched that much harder.
Was
there also a problem with transport and roads?
Yes transport
and roads are a difficult thing in that part of the world. There’s really
only two or three major roads that run through the Rouse Hill area and
they’re on a roughly north south alignment. That’s Windsor Road, Old Windsor
Road and a couple of other minor roads. Much of the traffic demand is
north south in that area. Say from out in Hawkesbury area down towards
Parramatta or towards the city via the freeways and other arterial roads.
As development occurred what effectively were rural roads ended up having
to support urban development. Unfortunately the roads weren’t upgraded
or other forms of public transport weren’t provided to take the pressure
off the roads at the same rate that development was occurring.
Tell
me something about the plans for The New Rouse Hill development?
The New Rouse
Hill is what we call a mixed use development. It is a town centre and
supporting residential area. The development site is just a little over
one hundred and twenty odd hectares. It comprises a mixed use town centre
which will include retailing, commercial land uses. It will include community
land uses such as the Council’s library and community buildings. It will
include a range of services such as health, medical and financial services.
A range of public open spaces as well in the Town Centre area. There will
be a supporting area which will include some further commercial and retail
development. An expansion area for the town centre as it matures over
time. There will be residential flats in the Town Centre and then as you
move out of the Town Centre into the residential land that surrounds it
you will come across town houses and villas and duplexes, some more residential
flats closer to the Town Centre through to traditional detached housing
allotments.
 |
|
Civic Way (artist's impression October 2002)
|
Is
this something new that hasn’t been done in Australia before?
The concept
itself isn’t that new of having a dense town centre and then having land
uses and residential densities decrease as you move away from that centre.
In terms of how some of the elements of The New Rouse Hill and particularly
of the Town Centre have been put together we think yes it is an example
of something that probably hasn’t been done before. What we’re talking
about here is building a regional centre from day one on a greenfield’s
site which is in it self a difficult task. The thing that we think probably
sets it aside from most other greenfield town centre is that ours is not
centred on an enclosed mall but on a main street. What we’re trying to
do is have all the convenience and comfort and safety and so on that might
be associated with a mall development, but which is a very anti social
development. It turns its back on the residential areas that surround
it. It puts up large walls and it privatises its internal space. What
we’re trying to do is explode that and have it as a public place, with
a public main street and allow for those casual and delightful things
that a town centre should allow for, the chance to meet your neighbours
and bump into them and happily meet them on the street and allow for that
sort of social interaction which is really important.
What
planning principles is this development based on at Rouse Hill?
The government’s
view was if the government was going to do development at New Rouse Hill
or work with others to do development at New Rouse Hill then we should
address the problems that had plagued the North West area up until that
point. Issues such as early provision of services very important to us.
The other thing that is probably the underpinning tenant of the New Rouse
Hill is the drive for sustainability that the centre has. That’s present
is terms of simply how we have congregated or grouped land uses together
to make sure it is an efficient use of land. That people can go to the
Town Centre and do multiple tasks instead of having to jump into their
car and drive many kilometres to do multiple tasks. But also in terms
on how it is designed, how passive solar heating of homes and of the town
centre itself, how it uses water and electricity and manages that demand.
They’re all fundamental tenants that are underpinning the design.
 |
|
Range of active streets and small intimate squares (artist's impression
October 2002)
|
So
is there an existing model somewhere in the world on which this New Rouse
Hill development is based?
At the moment
you say no, but someone could point to something that proves you wrong.
The Australian retailing trends follow those of the United States fairly
closely. So in the 1950’s and 1960’s when malls were being established
in the United States, malls started being established here about five
or six years afterwards. As those malls got bigger and bigger and bigger
in the 1980’s in the United States so they did here as well. The United
States has had a lot of difficulty in certain places with those malls
now and their being redeveloped to make them more like we’re making The
New Rouse Hill. I guess we saw that trend in the United States and said
“ well wait on let’s not go the next step and make the mega, mega mall
and then have to dismantle it, let’s do what their doing there now and
let’s try to invent this as a main street centre and see if is works”.
There is really great examples of good town centres right across Australia
and country towns are really good town centres, if they’re good and healthy
local economies. What we’re doing really is trying to encompass the best
of the traditional country town element with the main street as well as
then the convenience and comfort of an enclosed mall. To that extent I
don’t know that there is an example.
What’s
the projected budget for the whole thing?
At this stage
we think the total development will be something in the order of one point
five billion dollars of value at full development.
Wow
it’s not small bikkies is it?
No it’s a
very large amount of money.
Now
can you take me through the process of this development with chronological
dates if you have them for The New Rouse Hill? From say the selection
of the site, to the plans drawn up for development, to expressions of
interest being recorded, all those sort of things?
The site
was purchased by the government in the early 1980’s towards the end of
the 1980’s about 1987 a regional environmental study was done for the
north west sector, which identified the Rouse Hill area as the area which
would accommodate approximately a quarter of a million people over a thirty
or thirty five year time frame. The local environmental plans then to
facilitate the first stage of development were approved by the State Government
in 1991 took about eighteen months then for the first development to get
on the ground. It was the middle of 1993 that the initial stages of development
started to roll out on both the Blacktown and Baulkham Hills side of the
Rouse Hill area. Then there was a period of fairly consolidated and rapid
development in each of the council areas picking up on the residential
boom of the 1990’s and the early part of the 2000’s. Towards the end of
the 1990’s the State Government, the Department of Planning as the owner
of the land took a look at its side and said “well we’re starting to get
now sufficient development in our catchment that we might like to think
about how we would choose to develop this area”. In 1998 the Department
of Planning commenced some studies in concert with Baulkham Hills Shire
Council to look at how the area would develop. That culminated in a rezoning
plan for The Rouse Hill town centre it self in 2001. It was about that
stage that the State Government asked Landcom to help it in the next step
of the process. The State Government, the Department of Planning doesn’t
have a great deal of experience in doing land development. Our initial
role was to advise on what was the best thing to do with the site at this
stage. Would it be simply having obtained the rezoning to put a “for sale”
sign on it and to sell the site to whom so ever would be the best party
or would it be to take a longer term view. Take a stake in the development
and see the plans through. Our advice to the Department of Planning was
to do the latter, which they thought was also not a bad idea, and so in
2002 we organised for an expression of interest to the general development
industry to see who would like to develop The New Rouse Hill. In 2003
Lend Lease and GPT were selected as our preferred tenderer. There was
a period then consummating the deal and all of the legal drafting and
contract documentation to support that. Then in March of last year, 2006,
the first sod being turned at the Town Centre site to where we are today
where were a few months out of that Town Centre site being opened to the
public.
It’s
an incredibly rapid progress, I mean the last stages?
It has been
yes, particularly since the deal we struck with Lend Lease and GPT there
were a number of pre conditions that needed to be met before we had a
real deal. It took some time for those pre conditions to be met, but they
were met in February of last year. Since then they’ve built a town centre
which is really amazing.
 |
|
Aerial view of Mungerie Park homestead (centre top). Ironbark Ridge
Public School in the foreground. (April 2006)
|
What
sort of conditions and restraints were the in LEP (Local Environment Plan)
for the Rouse Hill area which the Council insisted on?
The Council’s
rezoning plan was a good plan it allowed for a wide range of land uses
in the Town Centre and it didn’t have a lot of controls in terms of limiting
floor space or limiting the heights of buildings. It’s been our subsequent
design process that has put limits on those things. The Council’s plans
though were all predicated on a hope that what had happened traditionally
in the North West sector, which was people well ahead of infrastructure
and services wouldn’t happen on this site. That’s been what’s driven both
us and Lend Lease GPT in doing what we have done on the site. It would
have been easy to do the first stages as residential development at The
New Rouse Hill. But the very first thing that opened at New Rouse Hill
was a primary school and a child care centre. The second major thing that
will open will be the Town Centre and then the people will come.
That’s
a little bit different to the way it’s usually done isn’t it?
It is but
that was one of requirements in the contract. That was one thing the government
wanted to see happen. And we’ve been very fortunate that Lend Lease and
GPT share exactly that same attitude. I think that’s been a great meeting
of minds on that point?
Was
there some initial scepticism within the Baulkham Hills Shire Council
in the early stage about this new development given the history of the
site?
Just a little.
The Council had that unfortunate legacy of the development occurring in
the Rouse Hill area and the services to lag dreadfully behind the demand
for them by the residents. So to one extent or another, the government
was seen to be a part of that problem in terms of its own infrastructure
budgets and its own allocations of funding for upgrading of infrastructure,
so the Council was fairly sceptical that a government development wouldn’t
just add to the problem and that there might be just empty rhetoric and
not much when you got behind it all. We were of course very conscious
of that perception and have worked very hard with our development partners
to make sure that it remained just a perception. I think now if you were
to talk to the Councillors as you have done in this exercise I think generally
the Council be of the opinion that its actually been a pretty good development
and the rhetoric was more than rhetoric and it was followed through in
actions and deeds.
It’s
a rather ambitious scheme isn’t it, I guess. How’s the Council feeling
about what’s happening on site there now?
I think the
Council is first of all very supportive of the development and to the
Council’s credit right the way through the process in the stages of scepticism
has still been very supportive of the project. But they’ve been very firm
in the aspiration and desire for what it should be. And that is a regional
centre for the north west of Sydney and that it should not display those
things which had be leagued development previously in that area. The Council’s,
I think, quite excited about how the vision had translated to the ground.
Council was very involved in helping us develop that vision before we
went and selected Lend Lease and GPT to be our joint development partners.
So the Council has had a number of very important things that it wanted
to see happen on the ground. Such as the provision of a site for its own
library which is now in the processes of being built and will be open
in March of next year. It’s been exercises such as that that have helped
us I think build a good relationship at the government level with the
Council. It’s gone from strength to strength now that we have out development
partners in there doing a fantastic development. Coming up out of the
ground there’s nothing like yellow, shiny machinery on site pushing dirt
around and scaffolding and concrete trucks to put to bed concerns that
it might be just simply empty rhetoric and nothing more than a mirage.
So the commitment and dedication that our joint partners have shown, Lend
Lease and GPT, in doing the development of The New Rouse Hill I think
has been the, I won’t say the final nail in the coffin of scepticism for
the Council, because I think the Council will always be healthily sceptical
about development to make sure it meets their standards and aspirations.
I think it has certainly been a good thing for developing a strong relationship
between all of the parties and the Council.
 |
|
Bicycle tracks and walkways linking Town Centre to residential area
(artist's impression October 2002)
|
Can
you explain the concept of the pedestrian loop around the quadrants in
the design?
The Town
Centre is very much like an internalised shopping mall except it doesn’t
have the four walls around the edges of it. The simple principles of a
successful shopping mall are that you have a number of anchor tenants
and you put them at either end of your shopping centre and then you spread
out the speciality shops between them. The anchors draw people in and
the fact that you put them at either end of the centre encourages people
to walk between one and the other and in so doing they pass all of the
secondary and smaller retailers. The New Rouse Hill is designed with that
principle in mind; there are the four major anchors from the Coles, Woolworths,
Big W and Target and they are put in one each in a quadrant. The quadrants
are defined by the external perimeter roads which will get you into the
underground car parking and then through the middle of the Town Centre
runs Main Street which divides it into half, east west and then the north
south road is Civic Way which divides the halves into half again which
creates the quadrants. The quadrants then contain one each of those major
anchors. Sitting out and linking the quadrants, breaking the quadrants
up again into eighths roughly is a pedestrian loop. It is what it says
it’s a pedestrian loop that takes you round the entire centre within which
cars are not allowed. It’s a pedestrian environment, partly covered, partly
open. It’s designed to look and feel like the little Melbourne lanes and
streets do. To have that element of surprise and delight and unexpected
things whilst you’re experiencing the town centre as a pedestrian and
it ties the whole thing together.
How did you come up with that idea? I mean what sort of research was done
to come to that?
We had the
basic of that idea but to give Lend Lease and GPT credit, it’s principally
their idea in how it was executed. We said to them that we wanted the
Town Centre to include roads that were trafficable. Roads that cars could
drive up and down. We think there are all sorts of benefits for that including
allowing for surveillance of areas perhaps after hours or when pedestrian
activity might not be quite as high as what it is during the day. The
other requirement was that there needed to be areas where pedestrians
would have the ultimate priority. That there would be no conflict with
cars, we had the idea of what we wanted to achieve but we left largely
to Lend Lease and their very clever people that they had working with
them, Lend Lease and GPT, to work out how to design that. So the pedestrian
loop was an integral part of the design that they came back to us with,
as one of four parties that were invited to lodge a tender with government
for the development of the site. Theirs was the best solution in terms
of how the Town Centre was constructed. We felt that their urban design
solution was outstanding.
So
what are the transport arrangements to and from The New Rouse Hill development
for say, cars, buses and rail?
There’s a
fairly well developed car network in the area already. That said The New
Rouse Hill is going to put more cars on the road so we’re upgrading Windsor
Road out of the front of the Centre from four lanes to six lanes and that
will be open the day that the Centre opens. That’s nearing completion
now those works. There are then intersections with that upgraded Windsor
Road into the Town Centre and also to the surrounding residential areas
that form part of the New Rouse Hill development as well. Bearing in mind
that there is eighteen hundred dwellings that are part of this development,
it’s not just the Town Centre it’s the residential development as well.
In terms of bus transportation Rouse Hill sits at the end of the Parramatta
rapid bus transit way link (North-West T-way) which is a dedicated
bus way that runs between Rouse Hill and Parramatta and picks up people
along the way. Then in the fullness of time the North West Rail Link is
also proposed to end at Rouse Hill. To have the station at Rouse Hill
and the current planning suggests that that will be up and running by
about 2017. When the Centre opens there will be a rapid bus transit system
and about ten years after it opens with any luck there will be a railway
station.
How
will they be integrated all those particular transport arrangements?
The Town
Centre had been designed knowing that there will be all these things happening.
The interaction of the Town Centre with the transport has been very important
in the design. Eventually when the rail arrives there will be an integrated
bus rail interchange, a smaller version of what you see at places like
Parramatta. But probably a slightly larger version that you see at places
like Epping where buses will come in drop people off and there will be
a below ground railway station and an interchange there between buses
and trains at that location.
 |
|
Landscaping is suited to the area (artist's impression October 2002)
|
Let’s
talk a bit about the environmental issues that this development is concerned
with, measure to improve its ecological footprint and so on, can you tell
me about that?
Dealing with
the environment and the sustainability of the development has been at
the heart of first of all government’s tendering process, and then consequently
at the heart of the design process undertaken by our partners. During
the time that that design has been worked up and now being implemented
Sydney has gone through one of its worse droughts if not the worst drought
on record. So the attention that we have paid to those issues I think
the importance of it has been demonstrated in what’s happened in that
time.
The New
Rouse Hill is designed to use less water than a traditional development
of a similar size to use much less electricity and energy and to use passive
solar design. To use the warmth of the sun to its best extent and to use
cooling breezes and orientation of buildings take advantage of those during
the warmer months. As a result the Town Centre for The New Rouse Hill,
our current estimate that it will consume twenty five percent less energy
and resources. Its ecological footprint will be twenty five percent less
than a traditional centre of the same size which we think is a great result.
Do
you have a figure also for the amount of water you might save?
Water reduction
in the Town Centre itself could be as much as eighty percent less than
a similar centre. We benefit a little bit because we do have a recycled
water system that we are required to hook into. That’s a recycled water
system that will eventually service all of the North West sector. We do
have a bit of a running start on some of the sustainability as far as
water is concerned, even so the design of the Town Centre has been done
in a way the minimises water use even more through simple things. Like
making sure the landscaping is suited to the area, through things like
designing streets so that when the water does fall on the streets its
run off to gutters goes through tree pits and so the trees that are in
the streets are passively watered in that way rather than having to turn
on a tap and water them. First time that this has been done and it’s a
GPT initiative and a terrific one, shopping centres need to test their
water safety systems once every number of months. When they do that all
of the water gets flushed out straight to the street and disappears, GPT
have found a way to capture that, put it in a holding tank and recycle
it and reuse it in the Town Centre. There’s also a one hundred and fifty
thousand litre tank in the basement of one of the car parks and that also
captures water and uses it around the Town Centre for watering and for
hosing and for cleaning functions in the external environment.
That’s
all new I haven’t heard of that before?
No a lot
of that stuff is ground breaking and full credit goes to our development
partners for coming up with those ideas. They knew that we wanted them
to be a bench mark and a leader in sustainability they had that goal to
work towards. The ways in which they have achieved it are really quite
astounding.
Have
there been any indigenous issues to contend with on this development?
In Western
Sydney there is quite often issues that need to be considered in the development
of land related to Aboriginal heritage of the area. Rouse Hill is no different,
Caddies Creek runs through roughly the middle of the development and Caddies
Creek for the Aboriginal people was an important meeting place. There
are quite a number of sites within Caddies Creek that have very high evidence
of previous Aboriginal occupation and in particular grinding grooves along
the creek. Where the sandstone rock has been used by the Aboriginal people
to sharpen tools and to make tools so Silcrete which is a very flaky rock
and not found in the Cumberland Plain has been brought by Aboriginal people
from outside of the Cumberland Plain into the area presumably for trading
or as part of Aboriginal people’s migratory patterns at the time. Silcrete
has then been manufactured into tools in Caddies Creek area and then sharpened
in the grinding grooves. There has been quite a number of grinding grooves
found along Caddies Creek as well as literally thousands of Silcrete flakes
which is a result of this quarrying and tool making process.
So
have you consulted with the Aboriginal people there?
Legislatively
we’re required to do that anyway, we have to do that as part of the development.
But again Lend Lease and GPT I think have gone certainly further than
many might in managing that consultation. In identifying the right people
to talk to in the Aboriginal community, so they've actively engaged with
four groups and two individuals people who’ve identified themselves as
having some connection with the area. And those people who’ve been involved
with the formation of plans for the area, they are being consulted on
an ongoing basis as the development occurs. They’ve assisted us in the
stripping and moving of topsoil where most of the Silcrete fragments were
found. They’ve assisted us in that process in identifying things that
should have been salvaged from that topsoil. And they will be consulted
further as we move into helping interpret the site, looking at information
boards along the creek that highlight the importance of the grinding grooves,
explaining the Aboriginal prehistory of the area.
Can
you tell me something about the financial arrangements for The New Rouse
Hill what will the different partners which I guess are the Department
of Planning, Landcom, Lend Lease and GPT contribute to it? What will be
their respective stakes in the project then?
I can’t go
into the exact financial arrangement because that’s part of the contract.
But I can describe in fairly simple terms what the basis of the contact
or the deal is. Government owns the land and government has contributed
land to the development. We are then in partnership with Lend Lease and
GPT to procure development on that land. The two inputs for development
are land plus capital, we’re providing the land Lend Lease and GPT are
providing the capital and so from that a town centre or houses are built.
They are sold to the end consumer. In the case of the town centre it will
be to GPT but in the case of individual houses it could be you and I.
Then according to various formulas that we have in the contract depending
on what sort of a land use it is then the money from that sale is split
differently between the various partners. So the government takes a share
for recognising its contribution of land in the first instance and the
developer Lend Lease GPT take a share recognising their contribution of
capital to the project in order to get it to happen. So in very simple
terms that’s the way the deal works.
 |
|
April 2006 work commenced on T-way along Windsor Road - Looking
in a North West direction with Rouse Hill Village development in
the background
|
Now
there was a fair bit of upgrading done on Windsor Road and the bus transit
lanes were established. Who actually paid for that was it the developer?
It’s a bit
of a mix really. The government has helped pay for some of that. The bus
transit ways (North-West T-way) by and large were paid for by
government. However one of the conditions of the Rouse Hill contract is
that the bus transit way for its length at the frontage of the Rouse Hill
site, that is paid for by the developer and handed over to government
at conclusion for operation. So there’s one instance where the developer
has contributed to, what is in other places government expenditure. Similarly
the upgrading of Windsor Road a portion of that is being met by State
Government, a portion of that is being met by the RTA, a portion of that
is being met by Landcom and a portion of that is being met by the developers.
Again there is many complex and boring formulas that sit behind that and
apportion that cost between the parties. That partnership extends to how
infrastructure is funded as well.
Now
Landcom of course is one of the project managers in this whole thing isn’t
it or is it the project manager?
We are the
Project Manager on behalf of government and so the developers also have
their Project Managers for the construction of the Town Centre. The Project
Manager is Bovis Lend Lease a part of the Lend Lease development entity,
Lend Lease Corporation. So their managing the development of the Town
Centre on behalf of GPT. The Delphin part of Lend Lease will manage the
development of the residential precincts on behalf of the Lend Lease GPT
joint venture. At any one time there are four different egos or entities
inside the tent two on the government side, two on the private sector
side facilitating the development that happens at Rouse Hill.
So
does Landcom have a continuing role in the project after the whole thing
is constructed?
The government’s
role will ultimately conclude in the project either when the last block
of land is sold to the last purchaser or at some time before that. If
we elect to say “well look all the things that government wanted to achieve,
have been achieved. There’s probably not a lot of point in us hanging
around in this project”. Then we can go to the developer and say “well
we’re thinking we might exit” and we’ll talk about how that might occur.
We wouldn’t see ourselves as having a continuing role. Our role has principally
been about setting up the vision, setting up the project on behalf of
government. Finding someone that’s capable of delivering that vision then
working with them in its initial phases to make sure we’re all on the
same page and make sure that vision is delivered in the way that government
had envisaged it. There will come a time and it might be five years, it
might be eight years or it might be ten years. I suspect there will probably
come a time when government will stand back and say “well we’ve achieved
everything that we wanted to achieve here or most of it and we’re confident
that we can put arrangements in place to make sure that the rest of it
is achieved”. We might choose at that time to exit the project.
 |
|
There will be shops out in the open (artist's impression October
2002)
|
You
think you’ve set a benchmark with this development in terms of what you’re
doing here?
Yes I think
we have. It’s a really difficult thing to explain and people who maybe
one day will listen to this oral history and it might sound like a confused
recollection or recounting of what is Rouse Hill. Because it’s a development
that will continue to occur and continue to grow and we’re really in the
initial stage of it now, but we do believe that it is a benchmark. It
is a benchmark that is really difficult to explain and so we expect that
inside of twelve months we’re going to be knocked over by people from
all over Australia and hopefully internationally coming to have a look
at the New Rouse Hill to see what it has done for sustainability. To see
how successful it is. To see that you don’t need to internalise all of
your public spaces in a traditional mall sense in order to create an environment
that shoppers feel safe and comfortable in. We think it will be a bench
mark we’ve had a difficult job explaining the project to people and continue
to do so. We’ve not been very successful in any of the awards we’ve entered
it in and we think that it’s such a difficult thing to explain that the
proof of the pudding actually is in turning up and having a look at it.
When the centre is formally opened in a little less than a years time
I think the value and the originality and the sheer scale of what’s been
achieved will be evident at that stage.
Well
coming to the end of my questions. Is there something else that you want
to mention that we haven’t covered in the interview?
There are
two things, most of our discussion here has been about the Town Centre
and that is obviously the thing that is most in your face about Rouse
Hill at present. It’s the thing that you see when you drive past on Windsor
Road and you couldn’t miss it it’s such a large development. It’s important
to remember that The New Rouse Hill isn’t just about the Town Centre it’s
a very important part of it. There’s also close to a billion dollars of
residential development that will occur as part of The New Rouse Hill
as well. That development will be home to four and a half thousand people
so we’ve got a really important job ahead of us in making sure that the
environment that we’re putting those people into is an environment that
they can be proud of and will suit their needs and their aspirations.
The journey’s really only just starting. The other thought that I’d really
like to emphasise is that I think the Rouse Hill is a private, public
partnership and PPP’s have had a bad rap recent times because they haven’t
gone well. I never want to speak too early but I think this is a good
example of how the private sector and government can work together where
our objectives and ideals are aligned. Where our aspirations are the same,
it’s a great example of how private sector know how can be applied to
government sector planning and vision, where the result of it is really
something that hopefully everybody can be really proud of.
|